|
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] >>
|
 |
IBM, Dell win in losing server market | The two companies ... No. 3 IBM, though, suffered less than competitors. Its revenue dropped 7 percent ... But mail-in rebates totalling $150 make it an even better ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
... processor IBM xSeries 445 server, both running the same VMware virtualization software stack, we demonstrate that the Dell configuration delivers 27% better price/performance than the IBM ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
... OS) set world-records for performance and blew away competitive systems from Dell/Microsoft and IBM ... based servers running AIX, all while consuming less power, resulting in more than five times better ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
... its X3 Architecture-based family of servers with the introduction today of the IBM ... which is 36 percent better throughput than the HP ProLiant DL580 G3 and 41 percent better throughput than the Dell ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
My personal opinion is that IBM and HP have better management tools (Director and SIM) than Dell, and better support. There are some differences in features that maybe one brand doesn't have that may ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
That doesnt mean I think Dells approach is better than IBMsand certainly not that I think Dells overall approach is good. (!) I just liked this one feature better.
|
| |
|
|
 |
Why are Dell Computer and IBM out there kicking booty in the computer business while just ... Who does that better than anybody? Right now it's Dell. And Dell is hotter than just about any technology ...
|
| |
|
|
 |
HP will have to build a corporate message as to why they're better able to support a PC business [than Dell or IBM] while at the same time growing their service and outsourcing business.
|
| |
|
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] >>
|
